3D
Thanks to James Cameron and a slew of other movies 3D technology is back and better than ever! I personally don't mind watching a movie in 2D but do venture to the local IMAX for a blockbuster hit or two that I think is worthy of a more immersive experience. Television makers have taken notice of the THREE DEE MANIA and have promised 3D capable sets within the year. There's just one problem with al this. Many of these TV sets, just like their big screen counterparts require glasses to see the 3D effect, and these snazzy lenses aren't cheap either. I think the cheapest run for about $40 bucks a pop with the average being $60.
Now watching TV has been traditionally a lazy activity, with the participant putting in very little effort other than using the remote. I don't want to add another step to this process and I really don't want to spend extra money. Also I already wear glasses and it will be silly to put on another pair just to enjoy a novelty. This is also why I don't care too much for 3D movies when I come out. At the moment I don't have contacts and don't plan on getting any for the eventual trip to a 3D movie.
Another problem arises when you have large families. Paying 40-60 bucks person (cause you know each kid has to have one) is asking a lot for a family on a budget. There was one manufacturer (I can't remember which) that said they can create a 3D effect sans glasses, which would be awesome if they could pull it off. I also think another company (maybe even the same one) stated they can make a TV where one person can watch in 3D and another in 2D, which will be just bananas.
3d technology, glasses, movies, television